What am I thankful for?
America, what are you thankful for?
I'm sure numerous blogs have been posted, speeches given at dinner, and cards exchanged; all of which elude to the idea that we should be thankful for each other and what we have in this world. Yet tonight I'm feeling a bit cynical.
The world is a mess. Poverty is at an all time high. AIDS is running rampant in other countries and growing in our own. Our economy is crumbling. Terrorists, drunk with ignorance and fundamentalism, are plotting to kill people every day. The prisons are crowded. The streets are unsafe. The list goes on and on, who knows what's going to happen tomorrow. Anything is possible in this shitty world...but...maybe I'm thankful for all of that.
We've been presented with a unique opportunity, one which hasn't been an option to the younger demographic since the 60s, and do you know what it is: It's the power to give a damn and do something about it.
I look around every day and I see young people intensely interested in politics. I know kids who stay up at night drinking beer and watching Anderson Cooper, getting hammered while debating issues. I see activists who won't take "no" for an answer. I've read columns proudly proclaiming: "I'm mad as hell and I'm not going to take it anymore!" I've seen charity. I've seen understanding. I've seen hate, and I've seen hate create immense love.
In the span of a week all these things have presented themselves to me and if it wasn't for the fucked up state of the world, I don't know if I would have seen it.
Our race possesses the unique ability to pull together when the chips are down and I don't have to tell you that the chips are far from down, they already hit the floor. Still I can't help but feel optimistic. Things are going to get worse, but they will also get better. We have an opportunity to make things right for everyone in this country, not just the upper crust or middle class. We have been given the chance to set into motion a long term vision for prosperity, and we have to hold our politicians to it. No more need to point fingers; we know why things got so bad. But it's because they got so bad that we can now take action.
We may live in one hell of a depressing place, but I'm thankful that I'm alive to see a time which is bringing the best out of people. There are a great many evils out there, but there is a lot of good too. Tomorrow is truly a new day if you wish it to be. I'm ready. Are you?
27 November, 2008
16 November, 2008
Take a Lesson From Machiavelli
In 1513 Niccolo Machiavelli wrote a treatise for Lorenzo de' Medici offering him advice as to how to rule should he come to unite the city-states of Italy. Il Principe, or The Prince, soon became a classic example of 16th century thought which went on to inspire numerous rulers such as Charles V, Catherine de' Medici, Cardinal Richelieu, and Frederick the Great.
What was special about The Prince was that it used history, not theory, to provide examples as to how a monarch should rule over the people. It also laid no claims to virtue. Asking the famed question whether it is better to be feared or loved, Machiavelli simply stated that to be loved was nice, but to be feared was better; a conclusion which dozens of dictators have also reached since the original publication of The Prince.
All this aside, the United States government would be wise to remember one important lesson from Machiavelli, especially given the recent news regarding the activities of Blackwater USA. Said Machiavelli:
Sadly, I'm of the opinion that no charges will be brought against them. Why? Because the US government needs Blackwater if they are to continue their war in Iraq.
The armed forces of the US have been suffering from dwindling numbers for years and with an increase unlikely in the decade, many inside the Pentagon will be wondering how long they can continue to sustain a volunteer army. Some will say the answer is to reinstitute the draft, however this is unlikely as it would be political suicide for any politician who supports it. The other option would be to continue the employment of mercenary organizations like Blackwater, which have already shown a complete disregard for human life in the name of collecting a paycheck. Still, all is not lost. There is a third option: stop fighting unnecessary wars and bring the boys home.
The Obama government is sure to focus more on infrastructure than flexing muscles on the global stage. As Obama and his aids search for ways to pull out of Iraq, they should consider terminating their contract with Blackwater and any other organization that kills for money. These organizations could care less about the health and well-being of the Iraqi or any nation within which they operate. All they care about is surviving battle so they can collect their paycheck, a very dangerous situation when you think about it. Would you trust a babysitter to watch your child if they knew you were going to pay them no matter what they did? Probably not. Then why would we trust our nation to babysitters toating sub-machine guns?
Eventually Blackwater will ask for more money or they will become a greater liablity than they already are. What will we do when they go to far? What will we do when they ask for money we don't have? The possible answers could range anywhere from leaving Iraq in a state of disarray, to taking control of sections of the country and holding them for ransom; the outcomes are numerous and equally horrible. There is only one option: scale back in Iraq, then get the troops home and end our relationship with Blackwater. Its the only way we can save face, distance ourselves from mercenaries and stop promoting the kind of blood tainted politics that we claim to fight against. If we don't take this course, who knows what could happen or what we will be held responsible for.
As I've said numerous times, the greatest problem with our nation is doubt. We always seem to convince ourselves that certain outcomes will never happen. This needs to change and taking a stance on Blackwater would powerful signal from the new government that we are privy the possibilities of the future and we do not want to be associated with blood-money.
He may have inspired some of the meanest bastards in history, but Machiavelli knew mercenaries were a bad idea. It's about time the US realized that too.
--Mr. FDR
What was special about The Prince was that it used history, not theory, to provide examples as to how a monarch should rule over the people. It also laid no claims to virtue. Asking the famed question whether it is better to be feared or loved, Machiavelli simply stated that to be loved was nice, but to be feared was better; a conclusion which dozens of dictators have also reached since the original publication of The Prince.
All this aside, the United States government would be wise to remember one important lesson from Machiavelli, especially given the recent news regarding the activities of Blackwater USA. Said Machiavelli:
"Mercenaries...are useless and dangerous; and if one holds his state based on these arms, he will stand neither firm nor safe; for they are disunited, ambitious, and without discipline, unfaithful...The fact is, they have no other attraction or reason for keeping the field than a trifle of stipend, which is not sufficient to make them willing to die for you."Two days ago it came to light that the mercenaries of Blackwater are guilty of ultra-violent misconduct in Iraq. For the last five years they have gotten away with manslaughter, assault, and illegally importing over 900 automatic weapons into Iraq without the proper permits. The United States Justice Department has done everything in their power not to charge Blackwater, even telling Congress they have no legal jurisdiction over the company. However numerous voices in and outside Washington are calling for Blackwater to be held accountable, though there is no guarantee that any actions will be taken against them.
Sadly, I'm of the opinion that no charges will be brought against them. Why? Because the US government needs Blackwater if they are to continue their war in Iraq.
The armed forces of the US have been suffering from dwindling numbers for years and with an increase unlikely in the decade, many inside the Pentagon will be wondering how long they can continue to sustain a volunteer army. Some will say the answer is to reinstitute the draft, however this is unlikely as it would be political suicide for any politician who supports it. The other option would be to continue the employment of mercenary organizations like Blackwater, which have already shown a complete disregard for human life in the name of collecting a paycheck. Still, all is not lost. There is a third option: stop fighting unnecessary wars and bring the boys home.
The Obama government is sure to focus more on infrastructure than flexing muscles on the global stage. As Obama and his aids search for ways to pull out of Iraq, they should consider terminating their contract with Blackwater and any other organization that kills for money. These organizations could care less about the health and well-being of the Iraqi or any nation within which they operate. All they care about is surviving battle so they can collect their paycheck, a very dangerous situation when you think about it. Would you trust a babysitter to watch your child if they knew you were going to pay them no matter what they did? Probably not. Then why would we trust our nation to babysitters toating sub-machine guns?
Eventually Blackwater will ask for more money or they will become a greater liablity than they already are. What will we do when they go to far? What will we do when they ask for money we don't have? The possible answers could range anywhere from leaving Iraq in a state of disarray, to taking control of sections of the country and holding them for ransom; the outcomes are numerous and equally horrible. There is only one option: scale back in Iraq, then get the troops home and end our relationship with Blackwater. Its the only way we can save face, distance ourselves from mercenaries and stop promoting the kind of blood tainted politics that we claim to fight against. If we don't take this course, who knows what could happen or what we will be held responsible for.
As I've said numerous times, the greatest problem with our nation is doubt. We always seem to convince ourselves that certain outcomes will never happen. This needs to change and taking a stance on Blackwater would powerful signal from the new government that we are privy the possibilities of the future and we do not want to be associated with blood-money.
He may have inspired some of the meanest bastards in history, but Machiavelli knew mercenaries were a bad idea. It's about time the US realized that too.
--Mr. FDR
03 November, 2008
Will MoveOn.org Move On? I Hope So.
I'm hoping Senator Obama wins the presidency tomorrow night. My hopes lie not in the fact that I see Obama leading this country in the right, more humanistic direction. Nor do they lie in the belief that his plan to cut taxes on the middle class will help stimulate the economy. No, I've come to terms with these and other issues weeks ago. Tonight the main reason I want Senator Obama to win tomorrow is so that MoveOn.org stops badgering me with incessant emails and phone calls.
I was once a proud member of the online community, signing petitions and sending them to my friends in emails. I even went so far as to encourage others to join. However once the primaries began I (an Obama supporter since day one and an extremely liberal individual) soon grew increasingly weary of the constant emails and plugs for money. Then as the bid for the White House drew closer to its conclusion, my weariness turned to annoyance as MoveOn members badgered me over the phone, practically forcing me to volunteer (apparently "maybe" in MoveOn's dictionary means "yes"). If this was not enough, I continually receive emails to this day asking for money or my time to ensure that Barack Obama wins the White House. I can't take it anymore!
Still you might be wondering why I'm upset. Shouldn't I enjoy their efforts since they're campaigning for my candidate? The answer: yes, but mostly no. Let me explain.
I love the fact that MoveOn has rallied so much support and grassroots activity for this election. Kudos lads. It's because of efforts by MoveOn members and other organizations that we're going to have a high voter turn-out this election with citizens certainly being more well-informed than they were last time around. Yet from here my enjoyment ceases and falls into a state of contemplation.
Given MoveOn's fervent support for Obama I can't help but wonder what they will do once he goes into office. Keeping in mind that MoveOn has always been a Democratic Party linked organization, its unsurprising that underneath their campaign for more citizen participation in government lies an agenda to usurp Republicans from positions of power. This has probably gone largely unnoticed because we've had a Republican president for the last 8 years, almost the entirety of MoveOn's existence. But once he is sworn into office, will they give Obama the same treatment they gave Bush?
I mean lets be realistic. It's highly unlikely Obama will meet expectations. Anyone who thinks the second he swears in the country will change for the better is either on cocaine or a moron. On top of this, Obama will need time and support to organize his plans and move them forward, after which it will probably take at least a full term before we start to notice the affects. All the while business, citizens, and congressman will surely get disgruntled about a multitude of things and President Obama will come under fire. Which then begs the question: Will MoveOn continue down its former path of citizen participation and critical evaluation of the government, or will it become Obama's core support group?
I'm sorry to say but given their conduct in the last 5 months, I think the answer is puppet. It's quiet clear to me that MoveOn has transformed into nothing but a front for one party/individual, to the point that I don't know if I can stay a member of the organization. The essence of MoveOn was change, change in the way citizens speak out against government policies and reach out to Congress. With Obama in office I can't see MoveOn being so aggressive, largely due to the fact that they put so much time and effort into getting him there. Thus, there is no other option but for them to become a front through which the Obama administration can spread their message. Will there still be petitions? Yes, I'm positive MoveOn will still have some petitions. Yet they certainly won't have any criticizing Obama, and by failing to do so they will help to silence the democracy they've tried to foster.
Some one call Jim Henson. I found him a new puppet.
I was once a proud member of the online community, signing petitions and sending them to my friends in emails. I even went so far as to encourage others to join. However once the primaries began I (an Obama supporter since day one and an extremely liberal individual) soon grew increasingly weary of the constant emails and plugs for money. Then as the bid for the White House drew closer to its conclusion, my weariness turned to annoyance as MoveOn members badgered me over the phone, practically forcing me to volunteer (apparently "maybe" in MoveOn's dictionary means "yes"). If this was not enough, I continually receive emails to this day asking for money or my time to ensure that Barack Obama wins the White House. I can't take it anymore!
Still you might be wondering why I'm upset. Shouldn't I enjoy their efforts since they're campaigning for my candidate? The answer: yes, but mostly no. Let me explain.
I love the fact that MoveOn has rallied so much support and grassroots activity for this election. Kudos lads. It's because of efforts by MoveOn members and other organizations that we're going to have a high voter turn-out this election with citizens certainly being more well-informed than they were last time around. Yet from here my enjoyment ceases and falls into a state of contemplation.
Given MoveOn's fervent support for Obama I can't help but wonder what they will do once he goes into office. Keeping in mind that MoveOn has always been a Democratic Party linked organization, its unsurprising that underneath their campaign for more citizen participation in government lies an agenda to usurp Republicans from positions of power. This has probably gone largely unnoticed because we've had a Republican president for the last 8 years, almost the entirety of MoveOn's existence. But once he is sworn into office, will they give Obama the same treatment they gave Bush?
I mean lets be realistic. It's highly unlikely Obama will meet expectations. Anyone who thinks the second he swears in the country will change for the better is either on cocaine or a moron. On top of this, Obama will need time and support to organize his plans and move them forward, after which it will probably take at least a full term before we start to notice the affects. All the while business, citizens, and congressman will surely get disgruntled about a multitude of things and President Obama will come under fire. Which then begs the question: Will MoveOn continue down its former path of citizen participation and critical evaluation of the government, or will it become Obama's core support group?
I'm sorry to say but given their conduct in the last 5 months, I think the answer is puppet. It's quiet clear to me that MoveOn has transformed into nothing but a front for one party/individual, to the point that I don't know if I can stay a member of the organization. The essence of MoveOn was change, change in the way citizens speak out against government policies and reach out to Congress. With Obama in office I can't see MoveOn being so aggressive, largely due to the fact that they put so much time and effort into getting him there. Thus, there is no other option but for them to become a front through which the Obama administration can spread their message. Will there still be petitions? Yes, I'm positive MoveOn will still have some petitions. Yet they certainly won't have any criticizing Obama, and by failing to do so they will help to silence the democracy they've tried to foster.
Some one call Jim Henson. I found him a new puppet.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)